North Carolina Providers

Search results for North Carolina: 114 providers

There are several providers offering RADIESSE® wrinkle filler in North Carolina. Use the map below to find the provider nearest you, or click on the city listings below the map. All of the medical professionals listed in this provider locator have received training on techniques specific to the aesthetic use of RADIESSE wrinkle filler.

You must have javascript enabled to view directions for any location.

Provider Map Legend

Albemarle Apex Arden Asheboro Asheville Boone Burlington Cary Chapel Hill Charlotte Clayton Clyde Concord Durham Elizabeth City Fayetteville Goldsboro Greensboro	Greenville Hendersonville Hickory Highlands Huntersville Lumberton Morehead City Nebo New Bern Pinehurst Raleigh Rocky Mount Salisbury Waxhaw Wilmington Wilson Winston Salem Winston-Salem

Patients Prefer RADIESSE® Volumizing Filler

See why RADIESSE^® Filler leads in patient satisfaction surveys

Manufactured by Merz Aesthetics, Inc.
Copyright © Merz Aesthetics, Inc. All rights reserved.
The Merz Aesthetics logo is a trademark of Merz Pharma GmbH & Co. KGaA.
RADIESSE is a registered trademark of Merz Aesthetics, Inc

Important RADIESSE Volumizing Filler Treatment Considerations
RADIESSE Volumizing Filler is FDA-approved for subdermal implantation for the correction of moderate to severe facial wrinkles and folds, such as nasolabial folds. After injection, patients may experience redness, bruising, swelling or other local side effects. Most side effects of treatment resolve within a few days. More rare side effects may include swelling that lasts longer, unevenness or firmness in the area injected, and as with any injection, there may be a risk of infection.

¹ Berlin A, Hussain M, Goldberg D. (2008) Calcium Hydroxylapatite Filler for Facial Rejuvenation: A Histologic and Immunohistochemical Analysis. Dermatologic Surgery, Volume 34, S64-S67.

² Bass LS, Smith S, Busso M, McClaren M. (2010) Calcium Hydroxylapatite (Radiesse) for Treatment of Nasolabial Folds: Long-Term Safety and Efficacy Results, Aesthetic Surgery Journal, 30 (2), 235-238.

³ Moers-Carpi MM, Opi Tufet J. Calcium Hydroxylapatite (RADIESSE^®) versus Nonanimal Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid (Restylane^®) for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds: a 60 patient, 12-Month, Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Split-Face Trial. Dermatol Surg 2008;34: 210-215.

⁴ Moers-Carpi M, Vogt S, Martinez Santos B, Planas J, Rovira Vallves S, and Howell DJ. A Multicenter, Randomized Trial Comparing Calcium Hydroxylapatite (RADIESSE^®) to Two Hyaluronic Acids (Juvéderm^® and Perlane^®) for Treatment of Nasolabial Folds. 205 Patients. Dermatol Surg, 2007; 33: S144-S151.

⁵ Based on a clinical study of 50 patients. Split face treatments of RADIESSE Volumizing Filler alone and RADIESSE Volumizing Filler mixed with 2% lidocaine were given to patients. Significant pain reduction is defined as a 2 point reduction on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Data on file.

⁶ Sundaram H, Voigts B, Beer K, Meland M. (2010) Comparison of the Rheological Properties of Viscosity and Elasticity in Two Categories of Soft Tissue Fillers: Calcium Hydroxylapatite and Hyaluronic Acid, Dermatol Surg, 36 (s3), 1859-1865.